Posts Tagged ‘Molly Lieber’

Movement Research Kicks Off 2010

The first Movement Research showing of the new year was packed; there was a line around the block despite the freezing weather.  I chatted with a young Austin dancer living in town for ADF’s winter intensive, and she explained that many in the audience were students in her workshop.  They were so excited to come to Judson Church for a taste of New York dance– which warmed my heart if not my toes.

It was a good night for a full house, since the showings were particularly strong.  Artist-in-Residence Jillian Pena put 4 women in pastel 80′s dancewear, set them up behind a backlit glass set (a two-way mirror, it would seem), and ultimately paired them with members of the audience– including Circus Amok’s Jennifer Miller.  With headphones providing prompts, volunteers performed on the fly with the rehearsed dancers, which was a fun way to start the evening and welcome the audience.

Molly Lieber and Eleanor Smith later performed with the same intriguing counterpoint I saw in their work at The Tank, working again with live musicians Aaron Harris and Yos Munro.  I am really loving this team.

Tadashi Kato has an interesting movement quality, though I was not drawn in by his airy choreography or soundscape of buzzwords like “intolerance” and “ecological destruction.”

The surprise treat of the evening came with the closing duet by Jennifer Monson and Yvonne Meier, announced just last week.   They’ve been dancing together since before I was born, and they are undeniably master artists.  Monday they were particularly silly, and their goofy movement intelligence drew plenty of cheers when they finished.

End of Year Reflections

Inspired by the endless best-of-2009 lists, decade-wrap-ups, and Evan’s own recap on Dancing Perfectly Free, I thought I’d take a stab at my favorite dance events of the past year.  There is so much that I missed, so in addition to being highly subjective, this list is also woefully incomplete.  But enough apologies, onto the praises!

Yanira Castro’s Dark Horse/Black Forest presented by PS122.  This work absolutely knocked me over– twice in a row.  Set in the bathroom of the Gershwin Hotel, two extraordinary dancers (Heather Olson and Joseph Paulson or Luke Miller and Darrin Wright) made us terribly uncomfortable by sharing intimate moments with us.  I learned the joys of having a performance invade my personal space, and I had the absolute pleasure of writing about it for the Rail.  It will be presented at the Skirball Center ladies’ room at Dance Gotham 2010, January 9 and 10.

Laura Peterson Choreography’s Forever. Photo by Steven Schreiber.

Laura Peterson’s Choreography’s Forever at DNA.  So much that I loved about formal dance in one clean performance.  Danceviewtimes ran a fantastic review in February.  Laura Peterson Choreography’s newest work, Wooden, will be shown January 12-13 at HERE Arts Center in a shared program with Johari Mayfield, and you can catch another look at Forever at the APAP showcase at DNA.

Ursula Endlicher’s Website Impersonations at Center for Performance Research.  Another dance installation that worked its way under my skin, the piece exposed the fundamentals of human learning and understanding by reflecting the virtual world.  The butoh-trained dancers were phenomenally intelligent and mature.  My review for the Rail is here.

Kate Weare Company at Danspace Project.  This was my first brush with these artists, and I was utterly enraptured, my memory of the show a blur.  The choreographic craft, understated power of the dancers (Jennifer Nugent’s devastating presence hangs in my consciousness), and musical cohesiveness combined to produce an emotionally weighted, deeply satisfying evening.  I left feeling that I had witnessed something divine.  Deborah Jowitt’s thoughts are here.

jill sigman/thinkdance's ZsaZsaLand. Photo by Gary Chou.

It’s wonderful, if not that common, that a show’s ambitious concept is fully realized.  I saw the revival of John Jasperse Company’s Becky, Jodi and John at DTW, which considered aging and art-making with humor and sensitivity.  There was a strange delicateness to it that seemed perfectly appropriate.  Read Claudia La Rocco’s thoughts on the first production.  Totally of-the-moment was jill sigman/thinkdance’s ZsaZsaLand at Office Ops, a brightly-colored, darkly-familiar celebration of excess and denial in response to the economic meltdown, war, and related crises.   I wrote about it here, and you can read Deborah Jowitt’s view here.  Finally, Dan Safer/Witness Relocation’s The Panic Show at DNA was delightfully spot-on dance theater exploring anxiety, and hilarious to boot.  If you missed it, there will be another showing at the APAP showcase at DNA.

Aside from the dancers mentioned already, I wanted to give a little space to three more: Judith Sanchez Ruiz, Jodi Melnick, and Natalia Osipova.  I saw Sanchez Ruiz in REPLICA, a duet with Jonah Bokaer for the LMCC Sitelines series this summer.  Both are fluid, clean, “quiet” dancers, absolutely beautiful movers with a post-modern clarity stripped of flash (Bokaer cut his teeth with Merce Cunningham, Sanchez Ruiz is in Trisha Brown’s company).  Sanchez Ruiz has a touch of bounce that distinguishes her from Bokaer, as if a rubber ball was in her body– but softly!  The bounce pours from her face, eyes and mouth in a way that is not “emotive” but pure dance.  It’s enthralling.  She was named one of Dance Magazine’s “25 to Watch” for 2010, and will be performing solo work at Danspace Project this February in a shared program with Souleymane Badolo. Jodi Melnick performed at The Kitchen before gracing John Jaspere’s show at DTW.  Claudia La Rocco’s NYT review captures some of the subtlety and magic of her movement.  And it may come as no surprise that I adored guest artist Natalia Osipova’s ABT performances this spring, particularly Giselle.  I wrote a short preview for the Rail anticipating her US debuts, but Alastair McCauley’s review confirms that she nailed it (Giselle, at least).  Robert Gottlieb praises her here.  This summer, we’ll finally get to see her Don Quixote, and she’ll dance the lead in Sleeping Beauty as well.

A few honorable mentions– first to Vanessa Anspaugh, whom I saw at Food for Thought at Danspace, and blogged about here. Her work will be performed at DTW’s Fresh Tracks in February.  Second, to Molly Lieber and Eleanor Smith at the Tank, to whom I devoted an extensive post on this site.  They will perform at Movement Research at Judson Church on January 4.  Third, to Christopher Williams for the scale of The Golden Legend at DTW (my response is here; Deborah Jowitt wrote a great piece for the Voice).  Finally, to Mark Morris’s Romeo and Juliet, for the exquisite music (and, I concede, I had a soft spot for his gender-bending Mercutio and Tybalt).   Like many, I love Prokofiev’s familiar 1940 score, but to hear the 1935 version, sweeter and somehow richer, blossoming from the orchestra pit was an experience I am glad not to have missed.

Whew!  What a year.  I’ll look forward to catching some of what I missed at APAP and PS122′s COIL Festival in January.

New Works at The Tank: Molly Lieber and Eleanor Smith

When the lights went out on Molly Leiber and Eleanor Smith’s Blanket Saturday night at The Tank, you could feel the collective “wow” coursing through the audience.  Quietly but undeniably expressive, Blanket was a work of absorbing beauty and unexpected power.

There were no interpretive notes or explanations in the program, but the title implications were clear in performance: connection, comfort, physical contact.  Separation anxiety.  Blurred boundaries of self—are we separate, or are we one?  Is a body whole, or a part?  The dancers were inextricable halves, whether actively touching, dancing in unison, or maintaining counterpoint while unable to see one another.

Equally essential to Blanket was another pair, musicians Aaron Harris and Yos Munro of the Brooklyn band Steel Phantoms.  Using silence, ambient electronic hums, wordless vocalization, shimmering percussion, claps, and bursts of full, toe-tapping and head-bobbing music, sound fit dance like a glove.  Harris and Munro’s connection to each other mirrored the dancers’ relationship, and they remained exquisitely attuned to the stage.

That stage bore sultry, casual bodies.  They began on opposite sides of the stage, slumped against the wall, but came together to pose.  Positions didn’t call attention to their own performativity, by quoting beauty pageants or dance technique manuals.  Instead, they made simple, pleasing shapes, interesting on their own but also loaded with shades of dependence—at once tender and uncomfortable.  When they separated, the space between them was charged with those tensions.  Their outstretched arms drifted toward each other without ever reaching directly.  When dancing together in a swell of sound, they moved as one.

I was repeatedly struck by their choreographic craft.  Meaning poured through the formalism, and action was nonchalant, neither pedestrian nor dancerly.  Gaze and focus for each body were brilliantly chosen.  Their movements were often loose at the joints, sculpted in their path through space, and totally engrossing.  My mind’s eye is still flooded with striking images: the back-to-back contrast of slumped plie and arched releve like yin and yang; one sweeping the other across the stage by her arms, as she twisted, legs glued like a mermaid, across the floor on her belly; stacked bodies rowing and pedaling; two straight backs, a foot apart, adjoined to circling arms that overlapped like teeth on gears; figures on opposite corners, making a micro-adjustment in sync (did anyone else see that??)

When they grabbed each others’ shoulders—a messy, lunged action—it felt extreme.  A raw emotional outburst in a dance otherwise restrained by suggestion.   Immediately it was tempered by repetition and form.  The dancers veered in diagonal, suspended in a needy, groping action that, failing to escalate, regained its essence as composition.  Dance with a capital D.

The carefully balanced dynamic had been shaken, though.  Soon after, one of the bodies just gave out, or gave up.  The other, with childlike denial and desperation, manipulated her like a ragdoll through the final passages.  It was funny (some laughed) but also sad, and scary.  Insistent on continuing, she looked frustrated by loss even while testing mischievous limits of the control she now exercised over the other’s actions.  Finally, a whisper into her ear brought the dancer faintly back (first her eyes opened, then she consented to the last simple movements).  This uneasy resurrection, pregnant with unanswered questions, ended the show.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.